Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nussinov, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nussinov, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol 11, 263-277, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Molecular shape comparisons in searches for active sites and functional similarity

M Rosen, SL Lin, H Wolfson and R Nussinov
Computer Science Department, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Here we examine the reliability of surface comparisons in searches for active sites in proteins. Detection of a patch of surface on one protein which is similar to an active site in another, may suggest similarities in enzymatic mechanisms, in enzyme functions and implicate a potential target for ligand/inhibitor design. Specifically, we compare the efficacy of molecular surface comparisons with comparisons of surface atoms and of C(alpha) backbone atoms. We further investigate comparisons of specific atoms, belonging to a predefined pattern of catalytic residues versus comparisons of molecular surfaces and, separately, of surface atoms. This aspect is particularly relevant, as catalytic residues may be (partially) buried. We also explore active site comparisons versus comparisons in which the entire molecular surfaces are scanned. While here we focus on the geometrical aspect of the problem, we also investigate the effect of adding residue labels in these comparisons. Our extensive studies cover the serine proteases, containing the highly conserved triad motif, and the chorismate mutases. Since such active site comparisons entail comparisons between unconnected points in 3D space, an order-independent comparison technique is necessary. The geometric hashing algorithm is ideally suited to handling such a task. It can perform both global shape matching for the whole surfaces of large protein molecules and searching for local shape similarities for small surface motifs. Our results show that molecular surface comparisons work best when the similarity is high. As the similarity deteriorates, the number of potential solutions increases rapidly, making their ranking difficult, particularly when scanning entire molecular surfaces. Utilizing atomic coordinates directly appears more adequate under such circumstances.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
D. La, J. Esquivel-Rodriguez, V. Venkatraman, B. Li, L. Sael, S. Ueng, S. Ahrendt, and D. Kihara
3D-SURFER: software for high-throughput protein surface comparison and analysis
Bioinformatics, November 1, 2009; 25(21): 2843 - 2844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.