Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, L.
Right arrow Articles by Vriend, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, L.
Right arrow Articles by Vriend, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 12, 1087-1095, December 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

A low resolution model for the interaction of G proteins with G protein-coupled receptors

L. Oliveira, A.C.M. Paiva and G. Vriend1,2

Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil and 1 BIOcomputing, EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

A model is presented for the interaction between G proteins and G protein-coupled receptors. The model is based on the fact that this interaction shows little specificity and thus conserved parts of the G proteins have to interact with conserved parts of the receptors. These parts are a conserved negative residue in the G protein, a fully conserved arginine in the receptor and a series of residues that are not conserved but always hydrophobic like the hydrophobic side of the C-terminal helix of the G protein and the hydrophobic side of a helix in the C-terminal domain of the receptor. Other, mainly cytosolic, factors determine the specificity and regulation of this interaction. The relation between binding and activation will be shown. A large body of experimental evidence supports this model. Despite the fact that the model does not provide atomic resolution, it can be used to explain some experimental data that would otherwise seem inexplicable, and it suggests experiments for its falsification or verification.

Keywords: GPCR/G protein interaction/model

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed; email: Vriend{at}EMBL-Heidelberg.DE


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Tello, S. Wu, J. E. Rivier, and N. M. Sherwood
Four functional GnRH receptors in zebrafish: Analysis of structure, signaling, synteny and phylogeny
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 21, 2008; (2008) icn070v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. Oliveira, C. M. Costa-Neto, C. R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, S. I. Shimuta, and A. C. M. Paiva
The Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Structure-Activity Correlations in the Light of Rhodopsin Structure
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 565 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Lagane, S. Ballet, T. Planchenault, K. Balabanian, E. Le Poul, C. Blanpain, Y. Percherancier, I. Staropoli, G. Vassart, M. Oppermann, et al.
Mutation of the DRY Motif Reveals Different Structural Requirements for the CC Chemokine Receptor 5-Mediated Signaling and Receptor Endocytosis
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 1966 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
L. Montanelli, J. J. J. Van Durme, G. Smits, M. Bonomi, P. Rodien, E. J. Devor, K. Moffat-Wilson, L. Pardo, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
Modulation of Ligand Selectivity Associated with Activation of the Transmembrane Region of the Human Follitropin Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2004; 18(8): 2061 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. P. Millar, Z.-L. Lu, A. J. Pawson, C. A. Flanagan, K. Morgan, and S. R. Maudsley
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 235 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. E. Breitwieser
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Oligomerization: Implications for G Protein Activation and Cell Signaling
Circ. Res., January 9, 2004; 94(1): 17 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Yang, W. Wang, M. Zhong, A. Philippi, O. Lichtarge, and B. M. Sanborn
Lysine 270 in the Third Intracellular Domain of the Oxytocin Receptor is an Important Determinant for G{alpha}q Coupling Specificity
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2002; 16(4): 814 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. J. Greasley, F. Fanelli, A. Scheer, L. Abuin, M. Nenniger-Tosato, P. G. DeBenedetti, and S. Cotecchia
Mutational and Computational Analysis of the alpha 1b-Adrenergic Receptor. INVOLVEMENT OF BASIC AND HYDROPHOBIC RESIDUES IN RECEPTOR ACTIVATION AND G PROTEIN COUPLING
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 46485 - 46494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. A. Zuniga, G. Shi, J. F. Haller, A. Rubashkin, D. R. Flynn, P. Iserovich, and J. Fischbarg
A Three-dimensional Model of the Human Facilitative Glucose Transporter Glut1
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2001; 276(48): 44970 - 44975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.