Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Innis, C.A.
Right arrow Articles by Blundell, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Innis, C.A.
Right arrow Articles by Blundell, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 12, 839-847, December 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Evolutionary trace analysis of TGF-ß and related growth factors: implications for site-directed mutagenesis

C.Axel Innis, Jiye Shi and Tom L. Blundell,1

Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK

The TGF-ß family of growth factors contains a large number of homologous proteins, grouped in several subfamilies on the basis of sequence identity. These subgroups can be combined into three broader groups of related cytokines, with marked specificities for their cellular receptors: the TGF-ßs, the activins and the BMPs/GDFs. Although structural information is available for some members of the TGF-ß family, very little is known about the way in which these growth factors interact with the extra-cellular domains of their multiple cell surface receptors or with the specific protein inhibitors thought to modulate their activity. In this paper, we use the evolutionary trace method [Lichtarge et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 257, 342–358] to locate two functional patches on the surface of TGF-ß-like growth factors. The first of these is centred on a conserved proline (P36 in TGF-ßs 1–3) and contains two amino acids which could account for the receptor specificity of TGF-ßs (H34 and E35). The second patch is located on the other side of the growth factor protomer and surrounds a hydrophobic cavity, large enough to accommodate the side chain of an aromatic residue. In addition to two conserved tryptophans at positions 30 and 32, the main protagonists in this potential binding interface are found at positions 31, 92, 93 and 98. Several mutagenesis studies have highlighted the importance of the C-terminal region of the growth factor molecule in TGF-ßs and of residues in activin A equivalent to positions 31 and 94 of the TGF-ßs for the binding of type II receptors to these ligands. These data, together with our improved knowledge of possible functional residues, can be used in future structure–function analysis experiments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. S. Negi, C. H. Schein, N. Oezguen, T. D. Power, and W. Braun
InterProSurf: a web server for predicting interacting sites on protein surfaces
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2007; 23(24): 3397 - 3399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S J. Lin, T. F Lerch, R. W Cook, T. S Jardetzky, and T. K Woodruff
The structural basis of TGF-{beta}, bone morphogenetic protein, and activin ligand binding.
Reproduction, August 1, 2006; 132(2): 179 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
I. Mihalek, I. Res, and O. Lichtarge
Evolutionary trace report_maker: a new type of service for comparative analysis of proteins
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2006; 22(13): 1656 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
D. M. Kristensen, B. Y. Chen, V. Y. Fofanov, R. M. Ward, A. M. Lisewski, M. Kimmel, L. E. Kavraki, and O. Lichtarge
Recurrent use of evolutionary importance for functional annotation of proteins based on local structural similarity
Protein Sci., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1530 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
B. R. Bowman, R. L. Welschhans, H. Jayaram, N. D. Stow, V. G. Preston, and F. A. Quiocho
Structural Characterization of the UL25 DNA-Packaging Protein from Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1
J. Virol., March 1, 2006; 80(5): 2309 - 2317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. Pei, W. Cai, L. N. Kinch, and N. V. Grishin
Prediction of functional specificity determinants from protein sequences using log-likelihood ratios
Bioinformatics, January 15, 2006; 22(2): 164 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. W. Cook, T. B. Thompson, S. P. Kurup, T. S. Jardetzky, and T. K. Woodruff
Structural Basis for a Functional Antagonist in the Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Superfamily
J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 40177 - 40186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. E. Donald and E. I. Shakhnovich
Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families
Nucleic Acids Res., August 5, 2005; 33(14): 4455 - 4465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Landau, I. Mayrose, Y. Rosenberg, F. Glaser, E. Martz, T. Pupko, and N. Ben-Tal
ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W299 - W302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
M. Saito, T. Oyama, and T. Shirai
Detection of subunit interfacial modifications by tracing the evolution of clamp-loader complex
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., March 1, 2005; 18(3): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Chakravarty, A. M. Hutson, M. K. Estes, and B. V. V. Prasad
Evolutionary Trace Residues in Noroviruses: Importance in Receptor Binding, Antigenicity, Virion Assembly, and Strain Diversity
J. Virol., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 554 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. O'Leary, J. M. Hamilton, C. M. Deane, N. V. Valeyev, L. J. Sandell, and A. K. Downing
Solution Structure and Dynamics of a Prototypical Chordin-like Cysteine-rich Repeat (von Willebrand Factor Type C Module) from Collagen IIA
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53857 - 53866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. ZHU and J. TYTGAT
Evolutionary epitopes of Hsp90 and p23: implications for their interaction
FASEB J, June 1, 2004; 18(9): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Madabushi, A. K. Gross, A. Philippi, E. C. Meng, T. G. Wensel, and O. Lichtarge
Evolutionary Trace of G Protein-coupled Receptors Reveals Clusters of Residues That Determine Global and Class-specific Functions
J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2004; 279(9): 8126 - 8132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. A. Stebbings and K. Mizuguchi
HOMSTRAD: recent developments of the Homologous Protein Structure Alignment Database
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2004; 32(90001): D203 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G.-i. Lee, Z. Ding, J. C. Walker, and S. R. Van Doren
NMR structure of the forkhead-associated domain from the Arabidopsis receptor kinase-associated protein phosphatase
PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11261 - 11266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.