Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drabik, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ciarkowski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drabik, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ciarkowski, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 10, 747-752, October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

The investigation of the effects of counterions in protein dynamics simulations

P. Drabik1,2,3, A. Liwo1, C. Czaplewski1 and J. Ciarkowski1

1 Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, ul. Sobieskiego 18, 80-952, Gdansk and 2 Department of Public Health, University School of Physical Education, ul. Wiejska 1, 80-336, Gdansk, Poland

Molecular simulations able to exactly represent solvated charged proteins are helpful in understanding protein dynamics, structure and function. In the present study we have used two different starting structures of papain (a typical, stable, globular protein of intermediate net charge) and different modeling procedures to evaluate some effects of counterions in simulations. A number of configurations have been generated and relaxed for each system by various combinations of constrained simulated annealing and molecular dynamics procedures, using the AMBER force field. The analysis of trajectories shows that the simulations of solvated proteins are moderately sensitive to the presence of counterions. However, this sensitivity is highly dependent on the starting model and different procedures of equilibration used. The neutralized systems tend to evince smaller root mean square deviations regardless of the system investigated and the simulation procedure used. The results of parameterized fitting of the simulated structures to the crystallographic data, giving quantitative measure of the total charge influence on the stability of various elements of the secondary structure, revealed a clear scatter of different reactions of various systems' secondary structures to counterions addition: some systems apparently were stabilized when neutralized, while the others were not. Thus, one cannot unequivocally state, despite consideration of specific simulation conditions, whether protein secondary structures are more stable when they have neutralized charges. This suggests that caution should be taken when claiming the stabilizing effect of counterions in simulations other than those involving small, unstable polypeptides or highly charged proteins.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.