Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peräkylä, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nordman, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peräkylä, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nordman, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 10, 753-758, October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Energetic analysis of binding of progesterone and 5ß-androstane-3,17-dione to anti-progesterone antibody DB3 using molecular dynamics and free energy calculations

Mikael Peräkylä,1 and Nana Nordman

Department of Chemistry, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland

Molecular dynamics simulations and molecular mechanics–Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) free energy calculations were used to study the energetics of the binding of progesterone (PRG) and 5ß-androstane-3,17-dione (5AD) to anti-PRG antibody DB3. Although the two steroids bind to DB3 in different orientations, their binding affinities are of the same magnitude, 1 nM for PRG and 8 nM for 5AD. The calculated relative binding free energy of the steroids, 8.8 kJ/mol, is in fair agreement with the experimental energy, 5.4 kJ/mol. In addition, computational alanine scanning was applied to study the role of selected amino acid residues of the ligand-binding site on the steroid cross-reactivity. The electrostatic and van der Waals components of the total binding free energies were found to favour more the binding of PRG, whereas solvation energies were more favourable for the binding of 5AD. The differences in the free energy components are due to the binding of the A rings of the steroids to different binding pockets: PRG is bound to a pocket in which electrostatic antibody–steroid interactions are dominating, whereas 5AD is bound to a pocket in which van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions dominate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.