Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bannwarth, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bannwarth, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 799-804, October 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Asymmetric conductivity of engineered porins

Michael Bannwarth and Georg E. Schulz1

Institut für Organische Chemie und Biochemie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Albertstrasse 21, D-79104 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Positively charged peptide segments of 16 and 18 residues were inserted at a periplasmic turn of the porin from Rhodobacter blasticus in order to form an electric field-dependent plug. The X-ray diffraction analysis of a mutant confirmed that the structure of the porin had remained intact and that the insert was mobile. Incorporation experiments of single molecules into lipid bilayers showed that the distribution of electric conduction increments depended on the field polarity. The observed distributions are explained if the porin molecules enter the bilayer preferentially with their periplasmic surface first. Furthermore, the conduction of membrane-incorporated porin mutants changed reproducibly on field reversal showing asymmetries of {bsim}15%, while the wild-type remained constant. This asymmetry is most likely caused by the electric field pressing the charged insert onto the pore eyelet in one field direction and removing it from the eyelet in the other. The results encourage attempts to improve the inserts in order to eventually reach diode characteristics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.