Protein Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 11, 871-879,
November 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding
Division of Mathematical Biology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill NW7 1AA, UK. 1 Informatica Ltd, 60 Charlotte Street, London W1T 2NV, UK
Recent advances in protein engineering have come from creating multi-functional chimeric proteins containing modules from various proteins. These modules are typically joined via an oligopeptide linker, the correct design of which is crucial for the desired function of the chimeric protein. Here we analyse the properties of naturally occurring inter-domain linkers with the aim to design linkers for domain fusion. Two main types of linker were identified; helical and non-helical. Helical linkers are thought to act as rigid spacers separating two domains. Non-helical linkers are rich in prolines, which also leads to structural rigidity and isolation of the linker from the attached domains. This means that both linker types are likely to act as a scaffold to prevent unfavourable interactions between folding domains. Based on these results we have constructed a linker database intended for the rational design of linkers for domain fusion, which can be accessed via the Internet at http://mathbio.nimr.mrc.ac.uk.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Sammut, R. D. Finn, and A. Bateman Pfam 10 years on: 10 000 families and still growing Brief Bioinform, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 210 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Bushell, C. Sollner, B. Schuster-Boeckler, A. Bateman, and G. J. Wright Large-scale screening for novel low-affinity extracellular protein interactions Genome Res., April 1, 2008; 18(4): 622 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N.I. Pang, K. Lin, M. A. Wouters, J. Heringa, and R. A. George Identifying foldable regions in protein sequence from the hydrophobic signal Nucleic Acids Res., February 2, 2008; 36(2): 578 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Alazard, L. Mourey, C. Ebel, P. V. Konarev, M. V. Petoukhov, D. I. Svergun, and M. Erard Fine-tuning of intrinsic N-Oct-3 POU domain allostery by regulatory DNA targets Nucleic Acids Res., July 26, 2007; 35(13): 4420 - 4432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Y. Poon, S. G. Withers, and L. P. McIntosh Direct Demonstration of the Flexibility of the Glycosylated Proline-Threonine Linker in the Cellulomonas fimi Xylanase Cex through NMR Spectroscopic Analysis J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 2091 - 2100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. George, K. Lin, and J. Heringa Scooby-domain: prediction of globular domains in protein sequence Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W160 - W163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bae, B. K. Mallick, and C. G. Elsik Prediction of protein interdomain linker regions by a hidden Markov model Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2264 - 2270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Klose and A. P. Bird MeCP2 Behaves as an Elongated Monomer That Does Not Stably Associate with the Sin3a Chromatin Remodeling Complex J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 46490 - 46496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Linhult, S. Gulich, T. Graslund, P.-A. Nygren, and S. Hober Evaluation of different linker regions for multimerization and coupling chemistry for immobilization of a proteinaceous affinity ligand Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2003; 16(12): 1147 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





