Protein Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 11, 881-885,
November 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Prediction of heterodimerization interfaces of G-protein coupled receptors with a new subtractive correlated mutation method
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
Recent studies employing differential epitope tagging, selective immunoprecipitation of receptor complexes and fluorescence or bioluminescence resonance energy transfer techniques provide direct evidence for heterodimerization between both closely and distantly related members of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. Since heterodimerization appears to play a role in modulating agonist affinity, efficacy and/or trafficking properties, the molecular models of GPCRs required to understand receptor function must consider these oligomerization hypotheses. To advance knowledge in this field, we present here a computational approach based on correlated mutation analysis and the structural information contained in three-dimensional molecular models of the transmembrane regions of GPCRs built using the rhodopsin crystal structure as a template. The new subtractive correlated mutation method reveals likely heterodimerization interfaces amongst the different alternatives for the positioning of two tightly packed bundles of seven transmembrane domains next to each other in contact heterodimers of GPCRs. Predictions are applied to GPCRs in the class of opioid receptors. However, in the absence of a known structure of any GPCR dimer, the features of the method and predictions are also illustrated and analyzed for a dimeric complex of known structure.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Fuchs, A. J. Martin-Galiano, M. Kalman, S. Fleishman, N. Ben-Tal, and D. Frishman Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins Bioinformatics, December 15, 2007; 23(24): 3312 - 3319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, K. Reilly, and Y. Chang Evolutionarily Conserved Allosteric Network in the Cys Loop Family of Ligand-gated Ion Channels Revealed by Statistical Covariance Analyses J. Biol. Chem., June 30, 2006; 281(26): 18184 - 18192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wang, X. Sun, L. M. Bohn, and W. Sadee Opioid Receptor Homo- and Heterodimerization in Living Cells by Quantitative Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 2173 - 2184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liang, D. Fotiadis, T. Maeda, A. Maeda, A. Modzelewska, S. Filipek, D. A. Saperstein, A. Engel, and K. Palczewski Rhodopsin Signaling and Organization in Heterozygote Rhodopsin Knockout Mice J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 48189 - 48196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Javitch The Ants Go Marching Two by Two: Oligomeric Structure of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 66(5): 1077 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Bakker, G. Dees, J. J. Carrillo, R. G. Booth, J. F. Lopez-Gimenez, G. Milligan, P. G. Strange, and R. Leurs Domain Swapping in the Human Histamine H1 Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2004; 311(1): 131 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Milligan G Protein-Coupled Receptor Dimerization: Function and Ligand Pharmacology Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2004; 66(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Breitwieser G Protein-Coupled Receptor Oligomerization: Implications for G Protein Activation and Cell Signaling Circ. Res., January 9, 2004; 94(1): 17 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Carrillo, J. Pediani, and G. Milligan Dimers of Class A G Protein-coupled Receptors Function via Agonist-mediated Trans-activation of Associated G Proteins J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42578 - 42587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




