Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bywater, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bywater, R. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 9, 721-725, September 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix

Michael S. Singer1,2, Gert Vriend3,4 and Robert P. Bywater5

1 Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, 3 Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, University of Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands and 5 Biostructure Department, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark

Proteins with similar folds often display common patterns of residue variability. A widely discussed question is how these patterns can be identified and deconvoluted to predict protein structure. In this respect, correlated mutation analysis (CMA) has shown considerable promise. CMA compares multiple members of a protein family and detects residues that remain constant or mutate in tandem. Often this behavior points to structural or functional interdependence between residues. CMA has been used to predict pairs of amino acids that are distant in the primary sequence but likely to form close contacts in the native three-dimensional structure. Until now these methods have used evolutionary or biophysical models to score the fit between residues. We wished to test whether empirical methods, derived from known protein structures, would provide useful predictive power for CMA. We analyzed 672 known protein structures, derived contact likelihood scores for all possible amino acid pairs, and used these scores to predict contacts. We then tested the method on 118 different protein families for which structures have been solved to atomic resolution. The mean performance was almost seven times better than random prediction. Used in concert with secondary structure prediction, the new CMA method could supply restraints for predicting still undetermined structures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
C. S. Miller and D. Eisenberg
Using inferred residue contacts to distinguish between correct and incorrect protein models
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2008; 24(14): 1575 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
D. S. Horner, W. Pirovano, and G. Pesole
Correlated substitution analysis and the prediction of amino acid structural contacts
Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 46 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. R. Langley, A. W. Walsh, C. J. Baldick, B. J. Eggers, R. E. Rose, S. M. Levine, A. J. Kapur, R. J. Colonno, and D. J. Tenney
Inhibition of Hepatitis B Virus Polymerase by Entecavir
J. Virol., April 15, 2007; 81(8): 3992 - 4001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
F. Birzele, J. E. Gewehr, and R. Zimmer
QUASAR--scoring and ranking of sequence-structure alignments
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2005; 21(24): 4425 - 4426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
L. C. Martin, G. B. Gloor, S. D. Dunn, and L. M. Wahl
Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins
Bioinformatics, November 15, 2005; 21(22): 4116 - 4124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.