Protein Engineering vol. 16 no. 12 pp. 1025-1034, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Using a residue clash map to functionally characterize protein recombination hybrids
Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 112 Fenske Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: costas{at}psu.edu
In this article, we introduce a rapid, protein sequence database-driven approach to characterize all contacting residue pairs present in protein hybrids for inconsistency with protein family structural features. This approach is based on examining contacting residue pairs with different parental origins for different types of potentially unfavorable interactions (i.e. electrostatic repulsion, steric hindrance, cavity formation and hydrogen bond disruption). The identified clashing residue pairs between members of a protein family are then contrasted against functionally characterized hybrid libraries. Comparisons for five different protein recombination studies available in the literature: (i) glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GART) from Escherichia coli (purN) and human (hGART), (ii) human Mu class glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1-1 and M2-2, (iii) ß-lactamase TEM-1 and PSE-4, (iv) catechol-2,3-oxygenase xylE and nahH, and (v) dioxygenases (toluene dioxygenase, tetrachlorobenzene dioxygenase and biphenyl dioxygenase) reveal that the patterns of identified clashing residue pairs are remarkably consistent with experimentally found patterns of functional crossover profiles. Specifically, we show that the proposed residue clash maps are on average 5.0 times more effective than randomly generated clashes and 1.6 times more effective than residue contact maps at explaining the observed crossover distributions among functional members of hybrid libraries. This suggests that residue clash maps can provide quantitative guidelines for the placement of crossovers in the design of protein recombination experiments.
Received August 1, 2003; revised October 21, 2003; accepted October 23, 2003
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Lefeuvre, D. P. Martin, M. Hoareau, F. Naze, H. Delatte, M. Thierry, A. Varsani, N. Becker, B. Reynaud, and J.-M. Lett Begomovirus 'melting pot' in the south-west Indian Ocean islands: molecular diversity and evolution through recombination J. Gen. Virol., December 1, 2007; 88(12): 3458 - 3468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Pantazes, M. C. Saraf, and C. D. Maranas Optimal protein library design using recombination or point mutations based on sequence-based scoring functions Protein Eng. Des. Sel., August 8, 2007; (2007) gzm030v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Meyer, L. Hochrein, and F. H. Arnold Structure-guided SCHEMA recombination of distantly related {beta}-lactamases Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2006; 19(12): 563 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Saraf, A. R. Horswill, S. J. Benkovic, and C. D. Maranas From the Cover: FamClash: A method for ranking the activity of engineered enzymes PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4142 - 4147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


