Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrowScopus Links
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alsop, E.
Right arrow Articles by Livesay, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alsop, E.
Right arrow Articles by Livesay, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering vol. 16 no. 12 pp. 871-874, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


COMMUNICATION

Optimized electrostatic surfaces parallel increased thermostability: a structural bioinformatic analysis

Eric Alsop1, Melanie Silver2 and Dennis R. Livesay1,3

1Department of Chemistry and 2Department of Biology, California State Polytechnic University at Pomona, Pomona, CA 91768, USA

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: drlivesay{at}csupomona.edu

It has been known for some time that thermophilic proteins generally have increased numbers of non-covalent interactions (salt bridges, hydrogen bonds, etc.) compared with their mesophilic orthologs. Recently, anecdotal structural comparisons suggest that non-specific acid–base ion pairs on the protein surface can be an evolutionary efficient mechanism to increase thermostability. In this comprehensive structural analysis, we confirm this to be the case. Comparison of 127 orthologous mesophilic– thermophilic protein groups indicates a clear preference for stabilizing acid–base pairs on the surface of thermophilic proteins. Compared with positions in the core, stabilizing surface mutations are less likely to disrupt the tertiary structure, and thus more likely to be evolutionarily selected. Therefore, we believe that our results, in addition to being theoretically interesting, will facilitate identification of charge-altering mutations likely to increase the stability of a particular protein structure.

Received July 23, 2003; revised October 14, 2003; accepted October 21, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.