Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johannissen, L. O.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johannissen, L. O.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering vol. 16 no. 12 pp. 949-955, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Protein fold comparison by the alignment of topological strings

Linus O. Johannissen1 and William R. Taylor2

Division of Mathematical Biology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK 1Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: wtaylor{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk

Using the definitions of protein folds encoded in a text string, a dynamic programming algorithm was devised to compare these and identify their largest common substructure and calculate the distance (in terms of the number of edit operations) that this lay from each structure. This provided a metric on which the folds were clustered into a ‘phylogenetic’ tree. This construction differs from previous automatic structure clustering algorithms as it has explicit representation of the structures at ‘ancestral’ branching nodes, even when these have no corresponding known structure. The resulting tree was compared with that compiled by an ‘expert’ in the field and while there was broad agreement, differences were found that resulted from differing degrees of emphasis being placed on the types of operations that can be used to transform structures. Some concluding speculations on the relationship of such trees to the evolutionary history and folding of the proteins are advanced.

Received June 19, 2003; revised September 13, 2003; accepted October 21, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.