Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, P.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, P.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering vol. 16 no. 6 pp. 407-414, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


Original Paper

Have we seen all structures corresponding to short protein fragments in the Protein Data Bank? An update

Peicheng Du, Michael Andrec and Ronald M. Levy1

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087, USA

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: ronlevy{at}lutece.rutgers.edu

Abstract

Assembling short fragments from known structures has been a widely used approach to construct novel protein structures. To what extent there exist structurally similar fragments in the database of known structures for short fragments of a novel protein is a question that is fundamental to this approach. This work addresses that question for seven-, nine- and 15-residue fragments. For each fragment size, two databases, a query database and a template database of fragments from high-quality protein structures in SCOP20 and SCOP90, respectively, were constructed. For each fragment in the query database, the template database was scanned to find the lowest r.m.s.d. fragment among non-homologous structures. For seven-residue fragments, there is a 99% probability that there exists such a fragment within 0.7 Å r.m.s.d. for each loop fragment. For nine-residue fragments there is a 96% probability of a fragment within 1 Å r.m.s.d., while for 15-residue fragments there is a 91% probability of a fragment within 2 Å r.m.s.d.. These results, which update previous studies, show that there exists sufficient coverage to model even a novel fold using fragments from the Protein Data Bank, as the current database of known structures has increased enormously in the last few years. We have also explored the use of a grid search method for loop homology modeling and make some observations about the use of a grid search compared with a database search for the loop modeling problem.

Received October 23, 2002; revised March 3, 2003; accepted March 30, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. Moult
Rigorous performance evaluation in protein structure modelling and implications for computational biology
Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2006; 361(1467): 453 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Fernandez-Fuentes, B. Oliva, and A. Fiser
A supersecondary structure library and search algorithm for modeling loops in protein structures.
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(7): 2085 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
R. Kolodny, L. Guibas, M. Levitt, and P. Koehl
Inverse Kinematics in Biology: The Protein Loop Closure Problem
The International Journal of Robotics Research, February 1, 2005; 24(2-3): 151 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.