Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R.
Right arrow Articles by Emig, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R.
Right arrow Articles by Emig, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering vol. 16 no. 8 pp. 589-597, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Optimizing the search algorithm for protein engineering by directed evolution

Richard Fox1,2, Ajoy Roy1, Sridhar Govindarajan3, Jeremy Minshull3, Claes Gustafsson3, Jennifer T. Jones4 and Robin Emig1

1Maxygen, Inc., 200 Penobscot Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063, 3DNA 2.0, Inc., 1455 Adams Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025 and 4Bioren, Inc., 100 Glenn Way, Suite 1, San Carlos, CA 94070, USA

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: richard.fox{at}maxygen.com

An in silico protein model based on the Kauffman NK-landscape, where N is the number of variable positions in a protein and K is the degree of coupling between variable positions, was used to compare alternative search strategies for directed evolution. A simple genetic algorithm (GA) was used to model the performance of a standard DNA shuffling protocol. The search effectiveness of the GA was compared to that of a statistical approach called the protein sequence activity relationship (ProSAR) algorithm, which consists of two steps: model building and library design. A number of parameters were investigated and found to be important for the comparison, including the value of K, the screening size, the system noise and the number of replicates. The statistical model was found to accurately predict the measured activities for small values of the coupling between amino acids, K <= 1. The ProSAR strategy was found to perform well for small to moderate values of coupling, 0 <= K <= 3, and was found to be robust to noise. Some implications for protein engineering are discussed.

Received January 2, 2003; revised May 13, 2003; accepted June 19, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.