Skip Navigation


PEDS Advance Access originally published online on July 25, 2006
Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2006 19(10):439-442; doi:10.1093/protein/gzl029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/10/439    most recent
gzl029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Loughlin, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Matsumura, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Loughlin, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Matsumura, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Review

Natural history as a predictor of protein evolvability

Taryn L. O'Loughlin, Wayne M. Patrick and Ichiro Matsumura1

Department of Biochemistry, Center for Fundamental and Applied Molecular Evolution, Emory University 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: imatsum{at}emory.edu

Natural selection generally produces specific and efficient enzymes. In contrast, directed evolution experiments usually produce enzyme variants with broadened substrate specificity or enhanced catalytic promiscuity. Some proteins may be more evolvable than others, but few workers consider this problem when choosing starting points for laboratory evolution. Here, we review the variables associated with enzyme evolvability, namely promiscuity and mutational robustness. We present a qualitative model of adaptive evolution and recommend that protein engineers exploit their knowledge of natural history to identify evolvable wild-type proteins. Three examples of ‘generalist’ proteins that evolved in the laboratory into ‘specialists’ are described to illustrate the practical utility of this point.

Keywords: adaptive evolution/catalytic promiscuity/directed evolution/evolvability/robustness

Received May 2, 2006; revised June 19, 2006; accepted June 22, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Protein Eng Des SelHome page
S. Kurtovic, A. Shokeer, and B. Mannervik
Diverging catalytic capacities and selectivity profiles with haloalkane substrates of chimeric alpha class glutathione transferases
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., May 1, 2008; 21(5): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Hou, M. T. Honaker, L. M. Shireman, L. M. Balogh, A. G. Roberts, K.-c. Ng, A. Nath, and W. M. Atkins
Functional Promiscuity Correlates with Conformational Heterogeneity in A-class Glutathione S-Transferases
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23264 - 23274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.