Protein Engineering vol. 4 no. 8 pp. 903-910, 1991
© 1991 Oxford University Press
RESEARCH-ARTICLE |
Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models
Department of Structural Biology, Biocenter, University of Basel CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland 2Permanent address Boris Kidric Institute of Chemistry POB 30, 61115 Ljubljana, Slovenia, Yugoslavia
1To whom correspondence should be addressed
Two approaches for calculating electrostatic effects in proteins are compared and an analysis is presented of the dependence of calculated properties on the model used to define the charge distribution. Changes in electrostatic free energy have been calculated using a screened Coulomb potential (SCP) with a distance-dependent effective dielectric permittivity to model bulk solvent effects and a finite difference approach to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann (FDPB) equation. The properties calculated include shifts in dissociation constants of ionizable groups, the effect of annihilating surface charges on the binding of metals, and shifts in redox potentials due to changes in the charge of ionizable groups. In the proteins considered the charged sites are separated by 3.512 Å. It is shown that for the systems studied in this distance range the SCP yields calculated values which are at least as accurate as those obtained from solution of the FDPB equation. In addition, in the distance range 35 Å the SCP gives substantially better results than the FDPB equation. Possible sources of this difference between the two methods are discussed. Shifts in binding constants and redox potentials were calculated with several standard charge sets, and the resulting values show a variation of 2040% between the best and worst cases. From this study it is concluded that in most applications, changes in electrostatic free energies can be calculated economically and reliably using an SCP approach with a single functional form of the screening function.
Keywords: dissociation constants/electrostatic effects in proteins/metal binding/redox potentials/solvent screening
Received May 22, 1991; accepted August 13, 1991.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Cui, M. Mezei, and R. Osman Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2008; 21(12): 729 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Banfi, G. Scialino, D. Zampieri, M. G. Mamolo, L. Vio, M. Ferrone, M. Fermeglia, M. S. Paneni, and S. Pricl Antifungal and antimycobacterial activity of new imidazole and triazole derivatives. A combined experimental and computational approach J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 76 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Sharma, M. Kapoor, T. N. C. Ramya, S. Kumar, G. Kumar, R. Modak, S. Sharma, N. Surolia, and A. Surolia Identification, Characterization, and Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum {beta}-Hydroxyacyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Dehydratase (FabZ) J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45661 - 45671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Frazao, I. Bento, J. Costa, C. M. Soares, P. Verissimo, C. Faro, E. Pires, J. Cooper, and M. A. Carrondo Crystal Structure of Cardosin A, a Glycosylated and Arg-Gly-Asp-containing Aspartic Proteinase from the Flowers of Cynara cardunculus L. J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 1999; 274(39): 27694 - 27701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-M. Zhang, M. S. Rao, R. J. Heath, A. C. Price, A. J. Olson, C. O. Rock, and S. W. White Identification and Analysis of the Acyl Carrier Protein (ACP) Docking Site on beta -Ketoacyl-ACP Synthase III J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2001; 276(11): 8231 - 8238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


