Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (169)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehler, E.L.
Right arrow Articles by Solmajer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehler, E.L.
Right arrow Articles by Solmajer, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering vol. 4 no. 8 pp. 903-910, 1991
© 1991 Oxford University Press


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models

E.L. Mehler1 and T. Solmajer2

Department of Structural Biology, Biocenter, University of Basel CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland 2Permanent address Boris Kidric Institute of Chemistry POB 30, 61115 Ljubljana, Slovenia, Yugoslavia

1To whom correspondence should be addressed

Two approaches for calculating electrostatic effects in proteins are compared and an analysis is presented of the dependence of calculated properties on the model used to define the charge distribution. Changes in electrostatic free energy have been calculated using a screened Coulomb potential (SCP) with a distance-dependent effective dielectric permittivity to model bulk solvent effects and a finite difference approach to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann (FDPB) equation. The properties calculated include shifts in dissociation constants of ionizable groups, the effect of annihilating surface charges on the binding of metals, and shifts in redox potentials due to changes in the charge of ionizable groups. In the proteins considered the charged sites are separated by 3.5–12 Å. It is shown that for the systems studied in this distance range the SCP yields calculated values which are at least as accurate as those obtained from solution of the FDPB equation. In addition, in the distance range 3–5 Å the SCP gives substantially better results than the FDPB equation. Possible sources of this difference between the two methods are discussed. Shifts in binding constants and redox potentials were calculated with several standard charge sets, and the resulting values show a variation of 20–40% between the best and worst cases. From this study it is concluded that in most applications, changes in electrostatic free energies can be calculated economically and reliably using an SCP approach with a single functional form of the screening function.

Keywords: dissociation constants/electrostatic effects in proteins/metal binding/redox potentials/solvent screening

Received May 22, 1991; accepted August 13, 1991.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
M. Cui, M. Mezei, and R. Osman
Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2008; 21(12): 729 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Banfi, G. Scialino, D. Zampieri, M. G. Mamolo, L. Vio, M. Ferrone, M. Fermeglia, M. S. Paneni, and S. Pricl
Antifungal and antimycobacterial activity of new imidazole and triazole derivatives. A combined experimental and computational approach
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 76 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Sharma, M. Kapoor, T. N. C. Ramya, S. Kumar, G. Kumar, R. Modak, S. Sharma, N. Surolia, and A. Surolia
Identification, Characterization, and Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum {beta}-Hydroxyacyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Dehydratase (FabZ)
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45661 - 45671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Frazao, I. Bento, J. Costa, C. M. Soares, P. Verissimo, C. Faro, E. Pires, J. Cooper, and M. A. Carrondo
Crystal Structure of Cardosin A, a Glycosylated and Arg-Gly-Asp-containing Aspartic Proteinase from the Flowers of Cynara cardunculus L.
J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 1999; 274(39): 27694 - 27701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-M. Zhang, M. S. Rao, R. J. Heath, A. C. Price, A. J. Olson, C. O. Rock, and S. W. White
Identification and Analysis of the Acyl Carrier Protein (ACP) Docking Site on beta -Ketoacyl-ACP Synthase III
J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2001; 276(11): 8231 - 8238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.