PEDS Advance Access originally published online on July 2, 2009
Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2009 22(9):561-567; doi:10.1093/protein/gzp035
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appears in the following Protein Engineering issue: Computational Methods Special Issue [View the issue table of contents]
Discovering rules for protein–ligand specificity using support vector inductive logic programming
1Structural Bioinformatics Group, Division of Molecular Biosciences 2Computational Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: l.a.kelley{at}imperial.ac.uk
Structural genomics initiatives are rapidly generating vast numbers of protein structures. Comparative modelling is also capable of producing accurate structural models for many protein sequences. However, for many of the known structures, functions are not yet determined, and in many modelling tasks, an accurate structural model does not necessarily tell us about function. Thus, there is a pressing need for high-throughput methods for determining function from structure. The spatial arrangement of key amino acids in a folded protein, on the surface or buried in clefts, is often the determinants of its biological function. A central aim of molecular biology is to understand the relationship between such substructures or surfaces and biological function, leading both to function prediction and to function design. We present a new general method for discovering the features of binding pockets that confer specificity for particular ligands. Using a recently developed machine-learning technique which couples the rule-discovery approach of inductive logic programming with the statistical learning power of support vector machines, we are able to discriminate, with high precision (90%) and recall (86%) between pockets that bind FAD and those that bind NAD on a large benchmark set given only the geometry and composition of the backbone of the binding pocket without the use of docking. In addition, we learn rules governing this specificity which can feed into protein functional design protocols. An analysis of the rules found suggests that key features of the binding pocket may be tied to conformational freedom in the ligand. The representation is sufficiently general to be applicable to any discriminatory binding problem. All programs and data sets are freely available to non-commercial users at http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/svilp_ligand/.
Keywords: functional residues/SVILP/machine learning/protein structure/function prediction
Received June 9, 2009; revised June 9, 2009; accepted June 11, 2009.