Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeffery, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Koshland, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeffery, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Koshland, D. E., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 10, 863-872, October 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

The Escherichia coli aspartate receptor: sequence specificity of a transmembrane helix studied by hydrophobic-biased random mutagenesis

Constance J. Jeffery and Daniel E. Koshland, Jr1

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 329 Stanley Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

The Escherichia coli aspartate receptor is a dimer with two transmembrane sequences per monomer that connect a periplasmic ligand binding domain to a cytoplasmic signaling domain. The method of 'hydrophobic-biased' random mutagenesis, that we describe here, was used to construct mutant aspartate receptors in which either the entire transmembrane sequence or seven residues near the center of the transmembrane sequence were replaced with hydrophobic and polar random residues. Some of these receptors responded to aspartate in an in vivo chemotaxis assay, while others did not. The acceptable substitutions included hydrophobic to polar residues, small to larger residues, and large to smaller residues. However, one mutant receptor that had only a few hydrophobic substitutions did not respond to aspartate. These results add to our understanding of sequence specificity in the transmembrane regions of proteins with more than one transmembrane sequence. This work also demonstrates a method of constructing families of mutant proteins containing random residues with chosen characteristics.

Keywords: chemotaxis/helix–helix interactions/signal transduction/transmembrane sequence

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.