Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrosino, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Palzkill, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petrosino, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Palzkill, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 9, 761-769, September 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Susceptibility of ß-lactamase to core amino acid substitutions

Joseph F. Petrosino1, Matthew Baker2 and Timothy Palzkill1,3,4

1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 2 Structural and Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Program and 3 Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA

To determine which amino acids in TEM-1 ß-lactamase are important for its structure and function, random libraries were previously constructed which systematically randomized the 263 codons of the mature enzyme. A comprehensive screening of these libraries identified several TEM-1 ß-lactamase core positions, including F66 and L76, which are strictly required for wild-type levels of hydrolytic activity. An examination of positions 66 and 76 in the class A ß-lactamase gene family shows that a phenylalanine at position 66 is strongly conserved while position 76 varies considerably among other ß-lactamases. It is possible that position 76 varies in the gene family because ß-lactamase mutants with non-conservative substitutions at position 76 retain partial function. In contrast, position 66 may remain unchanged in the gene family because non-conservative substitutions at this location are detrimental for enzyme structure and function. By determining the ß-lactam resistance levels of the 38 possible mutants at positions 66 and 76 in the TEM-1 enzyme, it was confirmed that position 76 is indeed more tolerant of non-conservative substitutions. An analysis of the Protein Data Bank files for three class A ß-lactamases indicates that volume constraints at position 66 are at least partly responsible for the low tolerance of substitutions at this position.

Keywords: ß-lactamase/compensating mutations/protein core/protein evolution/thermal value

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Sauvage, E. Fonze, B. Quinting, M. Galleni, J.-M. Frere, and P. Charlier
Crystal Structure of the Mycobacterium fortuitum Class A {beta}-Lactamase: Structural Basis for Broad Substrate Specificity.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2006; 50(7): 2516 - 2521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.