Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. C.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. C.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 12, 829-837, December 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

The ups and downs of protein topology; rapid comparison of protein structure

Andrew C.R. Martin

School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading RG6 6AJ, UK. E-mail: a.c.r.martin{at}reading.ac.uk

Protein topology can be described at different levels. At the most fundamental level, it is a sequence of secondary structure elements (a `primary topology string'). Searching predicted primary topology strings against a library of strings from known protein structures is the basis of some protein fold recognition methods. Here a method known as TOPSCAN is presented for rapid comparison of protein structures. Rather than a simple two-letter alphabet (encoding strand and helix), more complex alphabets are used encoding direction, proximity, accessibility and length of secondary elements and loops in addition to secondary structure. Comparisons are made between the structural information content of primary topology strings and encodings which contain additional information (`secondary topology strings'). The algorithm is extremely fast, with a scan of a large domain against a library of more than 2000 secondary structure strings completing in ~30 s. Analysis of protein fold similarity using TOPSCAN at primary and secondary topology levels is presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C.-H. Tung and J.-M. Yang
fastSCOP: a fast web server for recognizing protein structural domains and SCOP superfamilies
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W438 - W443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. M. Lisewski and O. Lichtarge
Rapid detection of similarity in protein structure and function through contact metric distances
Nucleic Acids Res., December 2, 2006; 34(22): e152 - e152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-M. Yang and C.-H. Tung
Protein structure database search and evolutionary classification
Nucleic Acids Res., August 2, 2006; 34(13): 3646 - 3659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Shapiro and D. Brutlag
FoldMiner and LOCK 2: protein structure comparison and motif discovery on the web
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2004; 32(suppl_2): W536 - W541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.