Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandsdal, B.O.
Right arrow Articles by Smalås, A.O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brandsdal, B.O.
Right arrow Articles by Smalås, A.O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, 239-245, April 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Evaluation of protein–protein association energies by free energy perturbation calculations

B.O. Brandsdal and A.O. Smalås1

Department of Chemistry, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway. E-mail: arne.smalas{at}chem.uit.no

The association energy upon binding of different amino acids in the specificity pocket of trypsin was evaluated by free energy perturbation calculations on complexes between bovine trypsin (BT) and bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). Three simulations of mutations of the primary binding residue (P1) were performed (P1-Ala to Gly, P1-Met to Gly and P1-Met to Ala) and the resulting differences in association energy ({Delta}{Delta}Ga) are 2.28, 5.08 and 2.93 kcal/mol for P1-Ala to Gly, P1-Met to Gly and to Ala with experimental values of 1.71, 4.62 and 2.91 kcal/mol, respectively. The calculated binding free energy differences are hence in excellent agreement with the experimental binding free energies. The binding free energies, however, were shown to be highly dependent on water molecules at the protein–protein interface and could only be quantitatively estimated if the correct number of such water molecules was included. Furthermore, the cavities that were formed when a large amino acid side-chain is perturbed to a smaller one seem to create instabilities in the systems and had to be refilled with water molecules in order to obtain reliable results. In addition, if the protein atoms that were perturbed away were not replaced by water molecules, the simulations dramatically overestimated the initial state of the free energy perturbations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.