Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cambi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vita, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cambi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vita, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 10, 807-813, October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Cytidine deaminase from two extremophilic bacteria: cloning, expression and comparison of their structural stability

Alessandra Cambi1,5, Silvia Vincenzetti2, Giampiero De Sanctis3, Jan Neuhard4, Paolo Natalini1 and Alberto Vita2,6

1 Department of Compared Morphological and Biochemical Sciences, 2 Department of Veterinary Sciences, 3 Department of MCA Biology, University of Camerino, Matelica, Italy and 4 Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

We cloned, purified and characterized two extremophilic cytidine deaminases: CDABcald and CDABpsy, isolated from Bacillus caldolyticus (growth at 72°C) and Bacillus psychrophilus (growth at 10°C), respectively. We compared their thermostability also with the mesophilic counterpart, CDABsubt, isolated from Bacillus subtilis (growth at 37°C). The DNA fragments encoding CDABcald and CDABpsy were sequenced and the deduced amino acid sequences showed 70% identity. High sequence similarity was also found with the mesophilic CDABsubt. Both enzymes were found to be homotetramers of approximately 58 kDa. CDABcald was found to be highly thermostable, as expected, up to 65°C, whereas CDABpsy showed higher specific activity at lower temperatures and was considerably less thermostable than CDABcald. After partial denaturation at 72°C for 30 min, followed by renaturation on ice, CDABcald recovered 100% of its enzymatic activity, whereas CDABpsy as well as CDABsubt were irreversibly inactivated. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of CDABcald and CDABpsy at temperatures ranging from 10 to 95°C showed a markedly different thermostability of their secondary structures: at 10 and 25°C the CD spectra were indistinguishable, suggesting a similar overall structure, but as temperature increases up to 50–70°C, the {alpha}-helices of CDABpsy unfolded almost completely, whereas its ß-structure and the aromatic amino acids core remained pretty stable. No significant differences were seen in the secondary structures of CDABcald with increase in temperature.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.