Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fariselli, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casadio, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fariselli, P.
Right arrow Articles by Casadio, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 11, 835-843, November 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations

Piero Fariselli1, Osvaldo Olmea2, Alfonso Valencia2 and Rita Casadio1,3

1 CIRB and Department of Biology, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 42, Bologna, Italy and 2 Protein Design Group, CNB-CSIC, Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain

Contact maps of proteins are predicted with neural network-based methods, using as input codings of increasing complexity including evolutionary information, sequence conservation, correlated mutations and predicted secondary structures. Neural networks are trained on a data set comprising the contact maps of 173 non-homologous proteins as computed from their well resolved three-dimensional structures. Proteins are selected from the Protein Data Bank database provided that they align with at least 15 similar sequences in the corresponding families. The predictors are trained to learn the association rules between the covalent structure of each protein and its contact map with a standard back propagation algorithm and tested on the same protein set with a cross-validation procedure. Our results indicate that the method can assign protein contacts with an average accuracy of 0.21 and with an improvement over a random predictor of a factor >6, which is higher than that previously obtained with methods only based either on neural networks or on correlated mutations. Furthermore, filtering the network outputs with a procedure based on the residue coordination numbers, the accuracy of predictions increases up to 0.25 for all the proteins, with an 8-fold deviation from a random predictor. These scores are the highest reported so far for predicting protein contact maps.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
B.-C. Lee and D. Kim
A new method for revealing correlated mutations under the structural and functional constraints in proteins
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2009; 25(19): 2506 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Lippi and P. Frasconi
Prediction of protein {beta}-residue contacts by Markov logic networks with grounding-specific weights
Bioinformatics, September 15, 2009; 25(18): 2326 - 2333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
C. S. Miller and D. Eisenberg
Using inferred residue contacts to distinguish between correct and incorrect protein models
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2008; 24(14): 1575 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Vassura, L. Margara, P. Di Lena, F. Medri, P. Fariselli, and R. Casadio
FT-COMAR: fault tolerant three-dimensional structure reconstruction from protein contact maps
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2008; 24(10): 1313 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Wu and Y. Zhang
A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction
Bioinformatics, April 1, 2008; 24(7): 924 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
D. S. Horner, W. Pirovano, and G. Pesole
Correlated substitution analysis and the prediction of amino acid structural contacts
Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 46 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
E. BINDEWALD and B. A. SHAPIRO
RNA secondary structure prediction from sequence alignments using a network of k-nearest neighbor classifiers.
RNA, March 1, 2006; 12(3): 342 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
O. Grana, V. A. Eyrich, F. Pazos, B. Rost, and A. Valencia
EVAcon: a protein contact prediction evaluation service
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W347 - W351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Punta and B. Rost
PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2005; 21(13): 2960 - 2968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
B. Shen and M. Vihinen
Conservation and covariance in PH domain sequences: physicochemical profile and information theoretical analysis of XLA-causing mutations in the Btk PH domain
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., March 1, 2004; 17(3): 267 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
I. Y. Y. Koh, V. A. Eyrich, M. A. Marti-Renom, D. Przybylski, M. S. Madhusudhan, N. Eswar, O. Grana, F. Pazos, A. Valencia, A. Sali, et al.
EVA: evaluation of protein structure prediction servers
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2003; 31(13): 3311 - 3315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.