Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Visiers, I.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Visiers, I.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 6, 409-414, June 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Differences in conformational properties of the second intracellular loop (IL2) in 5HT2C receptors modified by RNA editing can account for G protein coupling efficiency

Irache Visiers, Sergio A. Hassan and Harel Weinstein,1

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing events that have been demonstrated for 5HT 2C receptors resulted in alterations of the amino acid sequence at positions 156, 158 and 160 in the intracellular loop 2 (IL2) region. The edited receptor isoforms were shown to have reduced basal activity, but similar maximum responses to agonist binding. To identify the molecular mechanism of these pharmacological effects of editing we explored the conformational properties of the edited IL2 in comparison with the wild type. The results from conformational studies of the IL2 isoforms, using biased Monte Carlo simulations with an implicit solvent model based on a screened Coulomb potential, show that the compared loops differ in their preferred spatial orientations as a result of differences in the conformational space that is accessible to them by energy criteria. For the IL2 of the unedited (5HT 2C-INI ) receptor, the preference for structures oriented towards the 7TM bundle is larger than for the 5HT 2C-VGV edited receptor. This difference in preferred orientation can affect the association of IL2 with other intracellular loop domains involved in G protein coupling and hence the coupling efficiency. The results illustrate the high sensitivity of the system to small changes in the interaction surface presented to other intracellular loops, and/or the G protein.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. D. Urban, W. P. Clarke, M. von Zastrow, D. E. Nichols, B. Kobilka, H. Weinstein, J. A. Javitch, B. L. Roth, A. Christopoulos, P. M. Sexton, et al.
Functional Selectivity and Classical Concepts of Quantitative Pharmacology
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. C. Clark, T. E. Dever, J. J. Dever, P. Xu, V. Rehder, M. A. Sosa, and D. J. Baro
Arthropod 5-HT2 Receptors: A Neurohormonal Receptor in Decapod Crustaceans That Displays Agonist Independent Activity Resulting from an Evolutionary Alteration to the DRY Motif
J. Neurosci., March 31, 2004; 24(13): 3421 - 3435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
E. Sanders-Bush, H. Fentress, and L. Hazelwood
Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptors: Molecular and Genomic Diversity
Mol. Interv., September 1, 2003; 3(6): 319 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.