Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sussman, F.
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sussman, F.
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 9, 707-711, September 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


COMMUNICATION

Modified solvent accessibility free energy prediction analysis of cyclic urea inhibitors binding to the HIV-1 protease

Fredy Sussman1, M.Carmen Villaverde and Luis Martínez

Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

One of the most successful drug targets against AIDS in the last decade has been the HIV-1 protease (HIV-1 PR), an enzyme that processes the polyprotein gene products into active replicative viral proteins. In our quest for a wide-ranging, binding free energy function we have extended the solvent accessibility free energy predictor (SAFE_p) method, recently developed for peptidic HIV-1 PR inhibitors, to the study of the binding of cyclic urea (CU) HIV-1 PR inhibitors. Our results show that there is a need for a specific term depicting polar contacts to be added to the original SAFE_p analytical expression, an outcome not seen in our studies of HIV-1 PR peptidic inhibitors. Nevertheless, despite the higher profile of the electrostatic interactions in the binding of the CU inhibitors, our analysis indicates that CU inhibitor binding is still driven by the hydrophobic entropic contribution, as much as for the peptidic inhibitors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.