Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Znamenskiy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chomilier, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Znamenskiy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chomilier, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering vol. 16 no. 12 pp. 937-948, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

A new protein folding algorithm based on hydrophobic compactness: Rigid Unconnected Secondary Structure Iterative Assembly (RUSSIA). II: Applications

Denis Znamenskiy, Khan Le Tuan, Jean-Paul Mornon1 and Jacques Chomilier1

Systèmes Moléculaires et Biologie Structurale, LMCP, Universités Paris 6 et Paris 7, CNRS UMR 7590, Case 115, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: jean-paul.mornon{at}lmcp.jussieu.fr or jacques.chomilier{at}lmcp.jussieu.fr

The RUSSIA procedure (Rigid Unconnected Secondary Structure Iterative Assembly) produces structural models of cores of small- and medium-sized proteins. Loops are omitted from this treatment and regular secondary structures are reduced to points, the centers of their hydrophobic faces. This methodology relies on the maximum compactness of the hydrophobic residues, as described in detail in Part I. Starting data are the sequence and the predicted limits and natures of regular secondary structures ({alpha} or ß). Helices are treated as rigid cylinders, whereas ß-strands are collectively taken into account within ß-sheets modeled by helicoid surfaces. Strands are allowed to shift along their mean axis to allow some flexibility and the {alpha}-helices can be placed on either side of ß-sheets. Numerous initial conformations are produced by discrete rotations of the helices and sheets around the direction going from the center of their hydrophobic face to the global center of the protein. Selection of proposed models is based upon a criterion lying on the minimization of distances separating hydrophobic residues belonging to different regular secondary structures. The procedure is rapid and appears to be robust relative to the quality of starting data (nature and length of regular secondary structures). This dependence of the quality of the model on secondary structure prediction and in particular the ß-sheet topology, is one of the limits of the present algorithm. We present here some results for a set of 12 proteins ({alpha}, ß and {alpha}/ß classes) of lengths 40–166 amino acids. The r.m.s. deviations for core models with respect to the native proteins are in the range 1.4–3.7 Å.

Received July 25, 2003; revised October 25, 2003; accepted October 30, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.