Skip Navigation


PEDS Advance Access originally published online on January 20, 2004
Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2004 17(2):127-131; doi:10.1093/protein/gzh014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/127    most recent
gzh014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jelinek, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gráf, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jelinek, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gráf, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

Ala226 to Gly and Ser189 to Asp mutations convert rat chymotrypsin B to a trypsin-like protease

Balázs Jelinek1, József Antal2, István Venekei2 and László Gráf1,2,3

1Biotechnology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and 2Department of Biochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: graf{at}ludens.elte.hu

In a previous successful attempt to convert trypsin to a chymotrypsin-like protease, 15 residues of trypsin were replaced with the corresponding ones in chymotrypsin. This suggests a complex mechanism of substrate recognition instead of a relatively simple one that only involves three sites, residues 189, 216 and 226. However, both trypsin->elastase and chymotrypsin->trypsin conversion experiments carried out according to the complex model resulted in non-specific proteases with low catalytic activity. Chymotrypsin used in the latter studies was of B-type, containing an Ala residue at position 226. Trypsins, however, contain a conserved Gly at this site. The substantially decreased trypsin-like activity of the G226A trypsin mutant also suggests a specific role for this site in substrate binding. Here we investigate the role of site 226 by introducing the A226G substitution into chymotrypsin->trypsin mutants which were constructed according to both the simple (S189D mutant) and the complex model (S1 mutant) of specificity determination. The kinetic parameters show that the A226G substitution in the S1 mutant increased the chymotrypsin-like activity, while the trypsin-like activity did not change. In contrast, this substitution in the S189D chymotrypsin mutant resulted in a 100-fold increase in trypsin-like activity and a trypsin-like specificity profile as tested on a competing oligopeptide substrate library. Additionally, the S189D+A226G mutant is the first trypsin-like chymotrypsin that undergoes autoactivation, an exclusive property of trypsinogen among pancreatic serine proteases.

Received September 4, 2003; revised October 31, 2003; accepted November 4, 2003 Edited by Valerie Daggett


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.