Skip Navigation


PEDS Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2004
Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2004 17(6):537-543; doi:10.1093/protein/gzh063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/6/537    most recent
gzh063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Domingues, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lengauer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Domingues, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lengauer, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Protein Engineering, Design & Selection vol. 17 no. 6 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Automated clustering of ensembles of alternative models in protein structure databases

Francisco S. Domingues1, Jörg Rahnenführer and Thomas Lengauer

Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 85, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: doming{at}mpi-sb.mpg.de

Experimentally determined protein structures have been classified in different public databases according to their structural and evolutionary relationships. Frequently, alternative structural models, determined using X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy, are available for a protein. These models can present significant structural dissimilarity. Currently there is no classification available for these alternative structures. In order to classify them, we developed STRuster, an automated method for clustering ensembles of structural models according to their backbone structure. The method is based on the calculation of carbon alpha (C{alpha}) distance matrices. Two filters are applied in the calculation of the dissimilarity measure in order to identify both large and small (but significant) backbone conformational changes. The resulting dissimilarity value is used for hierarchical clustering and partitioning around medoids (PAM). Hierarchical clustering reflects the hierarchy of similarities between all pairs of models, while PAM groups the models into the ‘optimal’ number of clusters. The method has been applied to cluster the structures in each SCOP species level and can be easily applied to any other sets of conformers. The results are available at: http://bioinf.mpi-sb.mpg.de/projects/struster/.

Received June 18, 2004; revised August 3, 2004; Edited by Andrej Sali


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Zemla, B. Geisbrecht, J. Smith, M. Lam, B. Kirkpatrick, M. Wagner, T. Slezak, and C. E. Zhou
STRALCP structure alignment-based clustering of proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., December 3, 2007; 35(22): e150 - e150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
F. S. Domingues, J. Rahnenfuhrer, and T. Lengauer
Conformational analysis of alternative protein structures
Bioinformatics, December 1, 2007; 23(23): 3131 - 3138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.