Skip Navigation


PEDS Advance Access originally published online on August 5, 2005
Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2005 18(9):405-415; doi:10.1093/protein/gzi045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/9/405    most recent
gzi045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bastolla, U.
Right arrow Articles by Demetrius, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bastolla, U.
Right arrow Articles by Demetrius, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Stability constraints and protein evolution: the role of chain length, composition and disulfide bonds

U. Bastolla1,2,3 and Lloyd Demetrius4

1Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC), 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz and 2Centro de Biología Molecular ‘Severo Ochoa’, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain and 4Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at the Madrid address. E-mail: ubastolla{at}cbm.uam.es

Stability of the native state is an essential requirement in protein evolution and design. Here we investigated the interplay between chain length and stability constraints using a simple model of protein folding and a statistical study of the Protein Data Bank. We distinguish two types of stability of the native state: with respect to the unfolded state (unfolding stability) and with respect to misfolded configurations (misfolding stability). Several contributions to stability are evaluated and their correlations are disentangled through principal components analysis, with the following main results. (1) We show that longer proteins can fulfil more easily the requirements of unfolding and misfolding stability, because they have a higher number of native interactions per residue. Consistently, in longer proteins native interactions are weaker and they are less optimized with respect to non-native interactions. (2) Stability against misfolding is negatively correlated with the strength of native interactions, which is related to hydrophobicity. Hence there is a trade-off between unfolding and misfolding stability. This trade-off is influenced by protein length: less hydrophobic sequences are observed in very long proteins. (3) The number of disulfide bonds is positively correlated with the deficit of free energy stabilizing the native state. Chain length and the number of disulfide bonds per residue are negatively correlated in proteins with short chains and uncorrelated in proteins with long chains. (4) The number of salt bridges per residue and per native contact increases with chain length. We interpret these observations as an indication that the constraints imposed by unfolding stability are less demanding in long proteins and they are further reduced by the competing requirement for stability against misfolding. In particular, disulfide bonds appear to be positively selected in short proteins, whereas they evolve in an effectively neutral way in long proteins.

Keywords: disulfide bonds/folding thermodynamics/protein evolution/protein folding

Received December 9, 2004; revised and accepted June 21, 2005
Edited by David Thirumalai


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
M. Shirota, T. Ishida, and K. Kinoshita
Effects of surface-to-volume ratio of proteins on hydrophilic residues: Decrease in occurrence and increase in buried fraction
Protein Sci., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 1596 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Szilagyi, D. Gyorffy, and P. Zavodszky
The Twilight Zone between Protein Order and Disorder
Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 1612 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
E. Monsellier, M. Ramazzotti, P. P. de Laureto, G.-G. Tartaglia, N. Taddei, A. Fontana, M. Vendruscolo, and F. Chiti
The Distribution of Residues in a Polypeptide Sequence Is a Determinant of Aggregation Optimized by Evolution
Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4382 - 4391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Arolas, S. Bronsoms, S. Ventura, F. X. Aviles, and J. J. Calvete
Characterizing the Tick Carboxypeptidase Inhibitor: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR ITS TWO-DOMAIN NATURE
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2006; 281(32): 22906 - 22916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.