PEDS Advance Access originally published online on July 25, 2006
Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2006 19(10):439-442; doi:10.1093/protein/gzl029
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review |
Natural history as a predictor of protein evolvability
Department of Biochemistry, Center for Fundamental and Applied Molecular Evolution, Emory University 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: imatsum{at}emory.edu
Natural selection generally produces specific and efficient enzymes. In contrast, directed evolution experiments usually produce enzyme variants with broadened substrate specificity or enhanced catalytic promiscuity. Some proteins may be more evolvable than others, but few workers consider this problem when choosing starting points for laboratory evolution. Here, we review the variables associated with enzyme evolvability, namely promiscuity and mutational robustness. We present a qualitative model of adaptive evolution and recommend that protein engineers exploit their knowledge of natural history to identify evolvable wild-type proteins. Three examples of generalist proteins that evolved in the laboratory into specialists are described to illustrate the practical utility of this point.
Keywords: adaptive evolution/catalytic promiscuity/directed evolution/evolvability/robustness
Received May 2, 2006; revised June 19, 2006; accepted June 22, 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Haiko, M. Kukkonen, J. J. Ravantti, B. Westerlund-Wikstrom, and T. K. Korhonen The Single Substitution I259T, Conserved in the Plasminogen Activator Pla of Pandemic Yersinia pestis Branches, Enhances Fibrinolytic Activity J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2009; 191(15): 4758 - 4766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Haiko, M. Suomalainen, T. Ojala, K. Lahteenmaki, and T. K. Korhonen Invited review: Breaking barriers -- attack on innate immune defences by omptin surface proteases of enterobacterial pathogens Innate Immunity, April 1, 2009; 15(2): 67 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kurtovic, A. Shokeer, and B. Mannervik Diverging catalytic capacities and selectivity profiles with haloalkane substrates of chimeric alpha class glutathione transferases Protein Eng. Des. Sel., May 1, 2008; 21(5): 329 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hou, M. T. Honaker, L. M. Shireman, L. M. Balogh, A. G. Roberts, K.-c. Ng, A. Nath, and W. M. Atkins Functional Promiscuity Correlates with Conformational Heterogeneity in A-class Glutathione S-Transferases J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23264 - 23274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



